Tag: Darwin’s Doubt
A Lapse in Watchfulness: New York Times Admits Neo-Darwinism Faces a “Paradigm Shift” Over “Failure” to Explain Body Plans
A colleague has pointed out to me a 2007 article in the Times that I hadn’t previously seen. The author is Smithsonian paleobiologist Douglas H. Erwin.
Current Biology Paper’s Assumptions and Methodology Dramatically Underestimate “Rates of Change” in the Cambrian Explosion
While Stephen Meyer pointed out this paper’s most fundamental flaw, there are many other deficiencies. I focus on nine total in this article.
New Oxford Review Likes Darwin’s Doubt
Terry Scambray puts his finger on the problem that seems to bother many Darwinian evolutionists about Stephen Meyer’s conclusion in the book.
Does Lightning-Fast Evolution Solve the Cambrian Enigma?
The authors of a paper in Current Biology present the problem of the Cambrian explosion — the rapid emergence of new forms of animal life — as it own solution.
More on Small Shelly Fossils and the Length of the Cambrian Explosion: A Concluding Response to Charles Marshall
In my previous replies to Marshall’s review in Science of Darwin’s Doubt, I’ve responded to his critiques of the main argument of the book.