Tag: Darwin’s Doubt
To Build New Animals, No New Genetic Information Needed? More in Reply in Charles Marshall
To rebut the central argument of Darwin’s Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence.
When Theory Trumps Observation: Responding to Charles Marshall’s Review of Darwin’s Doubt
Leading paleontologists and evolutionary biologists (such as Dr. Marshall) are nowhere close to solving the Cambrian enigma.
Stephen Meyer Answers Charles Marshall on Darwin’s Doubt
Marshall’s review is an implicit rebuke to those critics who came before and thought their methods of evasion were an adequate reply.
A Taxonomy of Evasion: Reviewing the Reviewers of Darwin’s Doubt
For his review in Science of Stephen Meyer’s Darwin’s Doubt, UC Berkeley paleontologist Charles Marshall wins a prize.
In the Matter of John Farrell’s Silly Review of Darwin’s Doubt, National Review Sets Things Straight
You know, the one that climaxed with an examination of Stephen Meyer’s placement of an ellipsis mark.