The evidence commonly cited to argue for evolution’s ability to drive large-scale transformations is almost always circular.
News from Princeton discusses the work of Tom Smith and Bridgett vonHoldt, who have solved a “long-standing finch beak mystery.” The answer turned out to be Mendelian, not Darwinian.
I saw that biologist Nathan Lents says that he has been asked to review Mike Behe’s new book.
This book will be an event. Don’t just read Michael Behe’s latest — study it with Dr. Behe himself, in depth.
Some hares turn white in winter where it’s snowy, but remain brown in winter where it’s mild. What does that have to do with Darwinian evolution?