The Lehigh University biochemist addresses misconceptions about irreducible complexity, and responds to the claim that “molecular machines” is a misnomer.
“Let’s listen to the data,” says Eberlin. “Let’s surrender to the evidence” — which points to intelligent design.
The question she leaves unaddressed is why scientists would choose, despite the absence of evidence, despite the fact that the multiverse is “unobservable by assumption,” to believe in a multiverse.
“Science,” says chemist Marcos Eberlin, “should appeal only to causes that are supported by data, supported by evidence.”
He suggests to me yet another good question to ask the next Darwinist you meet.