As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques.
He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science.
During the Q&A, an attendee asked why intelligent design proponents don’t just come out and explicitly say the designer is God.
The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
Even Richard Dawkins can’t quite shake the idea that a sublime world like ours doesn’t come about by chance, but by “intelligent design.”