As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques.
He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science.
To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board.
If this is the best answer evolutionists can come up with, it’s game over for Darwinism.
If the future of science is really at risk, then surely not debating evolution is folly.