Tag: Debating Darwin’s Doubt
Coyne, Bechly, Miller, Berlinski: Scientists Debate David Gelernter’s Darwin Apostasy
If anyone is worrying, it is Coyne and his fellow Darwinists, alarmed at the defection of a stellar intellect like Gelernter.
Two Ways for ID Critics, Both Lame
As others have said before me, one of the first things you notice about ID critics is the low level of most of their critiques.
Yale’s David Gelernter: Darwin’s Doubt Is “One of the Most Important Books in a Generation”
He credits reading Meyer’s book as the primary cause of his rejecting neo-Darwinian evolution, a “brilliant and beautiful scientific theory” now overtaken by science.
In the Controversy over Intelligent Design, Seeking Genuine Dialogue
To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board.
In Cambrian Explosion Debate, ID Wins by Default
If this is the best answer evolutionists can come up with, it’s game over for Darwinism.