Tag: definition
Eberlin: But Is Intelligent Design “Science”?
“Science,” says chemist Marcos Eberlin, “should appeal only to causes that are supported by data, supported by evidence.”
At the Heart of Theistic Evolution, an Inescapable Contradiction
Some theistic evolutionists take umbrage at theistic evolution being called “theistic evolution.” I can understand why.
Science Is Not Simply “What Scientists Do”
I was alarmed to see physicist Sabine Hossenfelder accept as a definition of ”science,” not a method, but merely “what scientists do.”
Was Hitler a Creationist? Sure, Just Like Darwin
Hitler in his writing spoke of a “creator,” and a “Lord,” as well as using terms strongly suggestive of Darwinian thinking.
Ames Tribune Not Interested in News
The Ames Tribune editorial today tries to make out that Discovery Institute is more interested in headlines than in truth. Ironic, coming from a news organization that hasn’t even reported all of the news on this story. The piece sounds like it was ghost-written by the press office at ISU (or at least is based on ISU’s talking points).The news at the press conference this week was that a hostile work environment was created at ISU for Dr. Gonzalez — and then covered up by his colleagues, his department, the university, and now the Board of Regents. This thing stinks from top to bottom. That’s a big story. They tried to cover up what amounts to a crime — viewpoint Read More ›