We don’t routinely open the comments feature at ENV because of the staffing requirement that comes into play when we do, cleaning up after Darwinists who don’t know how to have a discussion on science without descending to the gutter.
Dennis Venema’s argument collapses into this: “if Darwinian evolution can do anything, then ID is wrong.” But this is not how we test ID, for ID readily allows that natural selection and random mutation can effect some changes in populations.
The questioners included one young gentleman, maybe 10 or 12 years old, who asked how butterflies kept breathing in the chrysalis stage.
ID isn’t precommitted to answers about how God must have acted, and leaves open the possibility that sometimes God doesn’t use “natural” causes.
The nation’s top Darwin-lobbying organization needs to clarify its position on associating with a creep like Fetzer. When will they do so?