No Harm, No Foul — What If Darwinism Were Excised from Biology?
Considering several recent papers shows that eliminating evolutionary words and concepts simplifies and improves scientific explanations.
First Review of Darwin Devolves Relies Heavily on Circular Reasoning
This line of argumentation only appears compelling to those who assume from that start that the core assumptions of the standard evolutionary model are true.
Ewert’s Dependency Graph Proposal: A Forest of Compositions
To help further explain this concept, I would like to introduce readers to my pet bunny, Daisy.
Encore Performances in the Design of Life
News from Princeton discusses the work of Tom Smith and Bridgett vonHoldt, who have solved a “long-standing finch beak mystery.” The answer turned out to be Mendelian, not Darwinian.
From Ewert’s Dependency Graph Paper – A “Gut Punch” to Darwin’s Tree?
I’m reminded again that the Bradley Center’s Robert Marks, among many other distinctions, was born to podcast.