In previous posts, I’ve covered how neo-Darwinism can make biological redundancy more confusing than it should be.
The author, Dean Schulz, an engineer with a PhD in computer science, takes a “bottom up” approach.
What about the charge that ID is a “curiosity killer,” tempting scientists to answer every natural mystery with a shrug and a “God did it”?
Darwin’s evolutionary mechanism is just a blunt recipe, an algorithm, and it can only select what is immediately functional.
One must separate beauty from mate choice in order to tell if animals recognize beauty.