Kepler rejected the idea that the enormous scale of the cosmos suggested that mankind is less important than in the cozier Aristotelian-Ptolemaic model.
Is this what Darwinism would predict? Of course not! Is it instead what intelligent design theory would predict? Indeed it is.
So, is every thing OK with Darwinism after all? No so fast. Actually, there are some problems that do not square well with a Darwinian scenario.
The mechanism of Darwinian evolution absolutely works — by breaking genes, when that provides a selective advantage, or turning them off.
While octopus brains are very different from vertebrate brains, they share with vertebrates, a huge number of microRNAs.