Peer-Reviewed Paper: “Neo-Darwinism Must Mutate to Survive”
They conclude, “there is something besides mutations and survival of the fittest needed to explain evolution.”
Intelligent Design’s Yellow Star: Journal’s Disclaimer Refutes a Common Criticism of ID
Critics of intelligent design (ID) often lecture ID proponents that they are free to submit their work to any scientific journal.
Corruption Watch: Biology Journal Blames the Innocent, Turns ID Scientists into Fall Guys
For those who are always lecturing us about “Follow the science” and “Believe the scientists,” this episode should be an eye opener.
Really? Editors Claim They Were “Unaware” of Article’s Intelligent Design Connections
The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design.
Retraction Watch Guys Hallucinate “Intelligent Design” Yet Again
A helpful formulation comes from podcaster Scott Adams, of “Dilbert” fame, who comments entertainingly on the political scene.