Obviously, these experiences point to something that is irrelevant to claims about evolution.
They conclude, “there is something besides mutations and survival of the fittest needed to explain evolution.”
Critics of intelligent design (ID) often lecture ID proponents that they are free to submit their work to any scientific journal.
For those who are always lecturing us about “Follow the science” and “Believe the scientists,” this episode should be an eye opener.
The implication is that the editors — Denise Kirschner, Mark Chaplain, and Akira Sasaki — did not realize the article was about intelligent design.