In arguing for 75 percent of the human genome as trash, has Dr. Graur slain the ENCODE dragon and rescued the Junk DNA myth? Nah.
Three brand new avenues of scientific discovery appear to need nothing from Darwinism.
To call him this is an irony, I realize, since the University of Houston evolutionary biologist and Junk DNA diehard is a flaming left-winger.
How evidence is interpreted is wrenched into line with the ideology. And this is what we mean by “zombie science.”
The concept of a “DNA Code” has a long pedigree in genetics. But what about the other nucleic acids?
NIH just funded five centers to explore what the “dark matter genome” (the non-protein-coding part) is doi
In Nature, Philip Ball acknowledges an “anxiety that admitting any uncertainty about the mechanisms of evolution will be exploited.”
In Nature, Philip Ball acknowledges there is an “anxiety that admitting any uncertainty about the mechanisms of evolution will be exploited.”
They are compelled to live with ambiguity until evolutionary models come along to explain ENCODE’s data.
Even in the face of compelling experimental results, many evolutionists still maintain that the vast majority of the human genome is junk.