Tag: ENCODE
As Undeniable Debuts in Paperback, Frontiers in Biology Demonstrate Axe’s “Functional Coherence”
Three brand new avenues of scientific discovery appear to need nothing from Darwinism.
Dan Graur, Darwin’s Reactionary
To call him this is an irony, I realize, since the University of Houston evolutionary biologist and Junk DNA diehard is a flaming left-winger.
Jonathan Wells: Zombie Science Keeps Pushing Junk DNA Myth
How evidence is interpreted is wrenched into line with the ideology. And this is what we mean by “zombie science.”
No Mere Bike Messenger, RNA Code Surpassing DNA in Complexity
The concept of a “DNA Code” has a long pedigree in genetics. But what about the other nucleic acids?
With Fresh Funding, ENCODE Team Continues Demolition of “Junk DNA” Myth
NIH just funded five centers to explore what the “dark matter genome” (the non-protein-coding part) is doi
#4 of Our Top Stories of 2015: Fear of Intelligent Design Prevents Some Biologists from Accepting ENCODE
In Nature, Philip Ball acknowledges an “anxiety that admitting any uncertainty about the mechanisms of evolution will be exploited.”
Fear of Intelligent Design Prevents Some Biologists from Accepting ENCODE’s Results
In Nature, Philip Ball acknowledges there is an “anxiety that admitting any uncertainty about the mechanisms of evolution will be exploited.”
With ENCODE Results, Evolutionary Biologists Are Forced to Wait in Perplexity
They are compelled to live with ambiguity until evolutionary models come along to explain ENCODE’s data.
Post-ENCODE Posturing: Rewriting History Won’t Erase Bad Evolutionary Predictions
Even in the face of compelling experimental results, many evolutionists still maintain that the vast majority of the human genome is junk.
Toppling Another Evolutionary Icon, ENCODE Data Suggests Endogenous Retroviruses Are Functional
ERVs are a favorite with Darwin defenders, claimed as a support for common descent.