The question she leaves unaddressed is why scientists would choose, despite the absence of evidence, despite the fact that the multiverse is “unobservable by assumption,” to believe in a multiverse.
“Follow the evidence wherever it leads.” It’s almost the official rallying cry of intelligent design proponents.
That’s what priest and professor of science education Michael Reiss argues.
“Science,” says chemist Marcos Eberlin, “should appeal only to causes that are supported by data, supported by evidence.”
If the universe were a radio and the desired setting allows for life, it would have dozens of dials for setting the values of the universal constants.