Sometimes scientists do not, in fact, follow the evidence. The consensus, then, could be wrong.
Some theistic evolutionists take umbrage at theistic evolution being called “theistic evolution.” I can understand why.
No threat to science today is in any way comparable to that posed by the state church of post-modern naturalism.
“It’s quite plausible” is treated as equivalent to evidence, eliding the question of how exactly we come to “consciously believe” anything.