Skip to content
  • ES
Evolution News Logo

Evolution News& Science Today

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
      • paleontology-tnPaleontology
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • walter-myers-III-150Walter Myers III
      • emily-reeves-smEmily Reeves
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • Günter BechlyGünter Bechly
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • George-Eliot-smElizabeth Whately
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • infodesk
  • Spanish Edition
  • 05.20.22

Tag: Evolution (journal)

Evolution IconEvolution
Emily Reeves
January 3, 2022, 1:26 PM

Do Statistics Prove Common Ancestry?

Consider a scenario where there are three German Shepherds: a mother, her son, and a third that is a genetically engineered clone of the son.

Evolution IconEvolution
Casey Luskin
May 22, 2020, 2:46 PM

Harvard Molecular Geneticist Vindicates Michael Behe’s Main Argument in Darwin Devolves

Mainstream evolutionary biologists are independently arriving at very similar conclusions to Behe’s central thesis.

Michael Behe
March 26, 2019, 5:16 AM

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 3

Perhaps the evidence for the vast scope of Darwin’s theory really isn’t as strong as biologists over the years have been telling each other.

Michael Behe
March 25, 2019, 3:13 PM

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 2

Lang and Rice cite a number of articles to show that loss-of-function mutations are just a small minority of those found in studies of organisms.

Evolution IconEvolution
Michael Behe
March 22, 2019, 4:17 AM

A Response to My Lehigh Colleagues, Part 1

Their review pretty much completely misses the mark. Nonetheless, it is a good illustration of how sincere-yet-perplexed professional evolutionary biologists view the data.

Posts navigation

Page1 Page2 Next

Trending

  • How Science Fueled the White Supremacist Mass Murderer in Buffalo, NY
  • How We Moved Beyond Darwin to the Miracle of Man
  • When Does Human Life Begin?
  • Why Are Science Reporters So Credulous?
  • Human Origins — The Scientific Imagination at Play
  • How Much Can Evolution Really Accomplish?

InfoDesk

  • Molecular Machines
  • Fine-Tuning Parameters
  • Protected: Vestigial Organs or Structures
  • Theistic Evolution
  • Charles Darwin

Recommended

  • More Cambrian Woes for Evolution
  • What Is ID and How Should We Defend It?
  • New Form of Biological Self-Replication?
  • Caltech Finds Amazing Role for Noncoding DNA
  • Ultra-Conserved Elements: Same Old Results

Archives

  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2022 Discovery Institute