This is fascinating stuff that flies in the face of the viewpoint treasured and defended by prestige academia and the mainstream media.
Clearly a naturalistic bias is at work here and imposes a limit on the spectrum of alternative explanations that is even considered to be permissible.
It’s another illustration of how the increasingly recognized inadequacies of materialist origins theories have failed to be reported to the general public.
There are many solid, trustworthy inferences in modern science, but there are those that are not very trustworthy at all.
Evolution’s deficits had been masked, he realized, by a combination of groupthink and the haziness of what biology could say about the molecular basis of life.