This is a field that often has more in common with the interpretation of inkblots in Rorschach tests than with hard science.
Says Stephen Meyer, “The neo-Darwinian math is itself showing that the neo-Darwinian mechanism cannot build complex adaptations.”
It is time for Darwinists to stop their science denial and face the fact that empirical data consistently contradict core predictions of their theory.
There is no good reason to assume that human intelligence evolved from mud to mind via a long slow history.
This is not how good science is supposed to work but is rather typical for pseudoscience that shields itself against empirical falsification.