How likely are biology teachers with doubts about Darwinism to participate in a survey by an organization instrumental in attacking Darwin-doubting teachers?
Just because something can be counted as science does not automatically mean that it is true.
When it comes to claims of the “nearly unanimous” acceptance of Darwinian evolution, mere assertion cannot stand as fact.
Evolution is good at creating niche advantages by breaking things; it isn’t good at building fundamentally novel forms.
Key terms in the evolution/ID debate are often misunderstood or misused. These include the word “evolution” itself.