Yes, Nathan Lents, finally we agree: it is “A good day for thoughtful discussion of evolution.”
A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.
In one paragraph Lents et al. twice cited sources they thought contradicted Behe, and twice suggested he ignored or dismissed contrary evidence.
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.
I recently had a lively conversation with a former colleague at the Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research in Cologne.