Tag: Francis Collins
Trouble in Paradise? At BioLogos, Theistic Evolutionists Fall Out Among Themselves
For years they have been gravely advising their fellow Christians that science rules out belief in a historical first pair of human beings.
Is the Universe “Rigged” for Life? Conversation with a Theistic Evolutionist, Continued
Random and undirected processes are clearly and obviously incapable of inventing new living things.
Jonathan Wells: Zombie Science Keeps Pushing Junk DNA Myth
How evidence is interpreted is wrenched into line with the ideology. And this is what we mean by “zombie science.”
The Case of the Mysterious Hoatzin: Biogeography Fails Neo-Darwinism Again
What’s the evidence that primates, rodents, and lizards crossed oceans on rafts?
Historian of Science Michael Keas Refutes the Argumentum ad Francis Collins
Don’t accept something simply because Francis Collins, BioLogos, or for that matter Michael Behe or Discovery Institute — or anybody else — tells you to.
Contradictions, Irony, and Appeals to Authority Permeate The Language of Science and Faith
Giberson and Collins appeal to authority but admit the evidence is all that matters, claim that anti-Darwin literature uses “outdated” arguments when their own book uses outdated arguments for evolution, and Giberson lacks the same qualifications of those Darwin-doubting scientists whose qualifications he attacks. Why are they making these weak, non-scientific, and self-contradictory arguments?
Karl Giberson and Francis Collins Commit Berra’s Blunder While Arguing for Macroevolution
Presto chango–evolution sounds so easy! But according to Darwin, evolution requires more than just “enough generations.” Darwin acknowledged that evolution also requires a continuous evolutionary pathway.
Does Giberson and Collins’ Neanderthal Argument Demonstrate “Common Ancestry”?
When most people hear “Neanderthal,” they think of a primitive caveman-like prehuman brute. What many don’t realize is that this popular view is very much a Darwinian interpretation, and it is betrayed by much evidence.
Rebutting Karl Giberson and Francis Collins’ Argument for Eye Evolution
Without evidence to back up their argument, it seems that Giberson and Collins simply want us to take their evolutionary claims about the power of mutation on faith.
Giberson and Collins Make Outdated Argument That Feathers Evolved From Scales
Karl Giberson and Francis Collins have relied upon some dangerous and historically weak arguments for evolution in their new book, The Language of Science and Faith.