To those who say ID advocates are only critical of Darwinism because they are not sufficiently versed in genetics, I have a two-word reply.
I believe the intelligent design perspective may offer insight into the peculiar inability of central nervous system tissue to regenerate.
The literature is looking at the same data that intelligent design proponents are looking at, making similar observations, and asking similar questions.
Evolutionists do not mind if selection goes forward, backward, up, down or sideways, as long as Darwin’s honor is maintained.
DNA is already known to be an ideal storage medium. Why not use cells to do the hard work?