This book is built on solid science. It’s going to be harder than ever for critics to spit it out just because they don’t like its taste.
Computer methods of analyzing mutations are widely used because they are generally accurate. They do not suddenly lose their accuracy when I cite them.
The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
Out of consideration for readers who want to judge the disagreements for themselves, that seems like the way to go.
It is a difficult question because, setting aside many other problems, the very starting point — the protein-coding gene — is highly complex.