The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
Out of consideration for readers who want to judge the disagreements for themselves, that seems like the way to go.
It is a difficult question because, setting aside many other problems, the very starting point — the protein-coding gene — is highly complex.
A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.