It’s always unfortunate when people misconstrue or misrepresent other people.
Lamoureux is the theistic evolutionist who left an indelible impression a couple of years ago when he debated Stephen Meyer and atheist Lawrence Krauss.
Scientism’s grand progress narrative holds that as we learn more and more about the world, purely natural or material explanations inevitably will arise and grow stronger.
Can we be frank? Cootsona’s treatment of ID is pathetic. As “scholarship,” it’s embarrassing.
After following the discussion about evolution versus design for the past few decades, I have noticed a common trend.