The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action.
“Imagine two science teachers. Mr. Smith expects students simply to memorize and correctly regurgitate.”
Winston Ewert’s results are a Copernican Revolution moment.
In all of his “poor” design arguments, Lents inadvertently embraces the design inference.
Joseph Le Conte stated what will become clear to anyone who tries to present evidence to Darwinists.