If the paper is any indication, appearing as it does in a prominent journal, some of the suffocating constraints on ID advocacy may be coming off.
The article survived peer-review and was accepted for publication despite the open hostility of the journal’s top editors!
Given a “primal blueprint” that preceded the first life, the solution can only be intelligent design.
I urge you to review this important series. Humbly place it at the feet of your favorite Darwinist, atheist, or theistic evolutionist.
The censors came for us first, and no one protested. Now they’re coming for you. Indeed, they are coming for Charles Darwin himself.