Darwinists easily obtain a global microphone to rant against intelligent design, while ID advocates silently gain adherents. Is it a sign of desperation?
Leisola and Witt also discuss the well-documented pattern of scientists defending an existing paradigm even after fresh discoveries have turned against it.
Take a look at a plant that takes nothing but gives everything. Why should it deliver so much good to so many?
He suggests to me yet another good question to ask the next Darwinist you meet.
Pointing out the review’s many failings will be the work of multiple articles. Let’s start by zeroing in on just one segment.