As Meyer says, isn’t there something “unstable” about being “pro-“ any faith that you don’t also affirm in objective terms, “that it really happened”?
Materialists who purport to explain the origin of nature’s complexity by smuggling in information unwittingly demonstrate the need for intelligent design.
The great question behind Steve Meyer’s new book is whether world-views can be objectively tested.
While heroes of the U.S. Armed Forces have given their lives, the scholars who critique scientific atheism and advance the theory of ID offer of themselves in different ways.
We may dispute what Darwin felt or thought in the privacy of his study — but the bulk of his writings fall clearly into advocating for one perspective: naturalism.