Remember this the next time ideologically driven scientists, bioethicists, and their media water carriers seek to drive public opinion.
Ethical constraints still depend only on scientists’ restraint — a “thin reed to stand on.”
Darwinian evolution and intelligent design are competing theories of biological origins, but they are more than that.
After going through the appearance of hand-wringing, I wouldn’t expect much of a problem if scientists said they really wanted to proceed.
Why does the evolution debate matter so intensely?