What a strange thing to say. To represent someone with his own words, while pointing out his failure to respond to substantive critiques, is “slander”?
Dave Farina has “tremendous reading skills” — he can read from a script, on YouTube or in a debate, with fluency and confidence.
I was struck by how quickly Farina was dominated and deflated as soon as he had run out of script and had to speak on his own two feet.
As Eberlin observes, for Darwinists, the “devil is in the details” and they fear the devil.
Egnor he nails it by noting that Shallit, not uniquely, falls victim to the mereological fallacy.