Tag: Irreducible Complexity
Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation
Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim.
In the Controversy over Intelligent Design, Seeking Genuine Dialogue
To me, this kind of back and forth is more amenable to serious discussion and reflection than quick volleys on a discussion board.
Darwinists Devolve: Review by Swamidass, Lenski, and Lents Borders on Fraud
I found their review utterly convincing — although probably not in the way the authors might hope.
First Review of Darwin Devolves Relies Heavily on Circular Reasoning
This line of argumentation only appears compelling to those who assume from that start that the core assumptions of the standard evolutionary model are true.
When It Comes to Origins Science, Is PNAS Really “Ready When You Are”?
Kevin Williamson imagines that scientists are free to “slug it out” in journals and other academic settings, so that the truth reliably emerges.