Skip to content
  • ES
Evolution News Logo

Evolution News& Science Today

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
      • paleontology-tnPaleontology
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • walter-myers-III-150Walter Myers III
      • emily-reeves-smEmily Reeves
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • Günter BechlyGünter Bechly
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • George-Eliot-smElizabeth Whately
      • david-coppedge-2022-scaled-128David Coppedge
      • Neil-Thomas-2021-scaled-128Neil Thomas
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • infodesk
  • Spanish Edition
  • 06.28.22

Tag: James Shapiro

James A. Shapiro
January 18, 2012, 3:21 PM

A Response to Ann Gauger’s and Douglas Axe’s Comments

Continuing a conversation initiated by Bill Dembski (“Is James Shapiro a Design Theorist?”)…

Douglas Axe@DougAxe
January 17, 2012, 3:56 PM

Let Science Be the Arbiter: A Reply to James Shapiro

If Shapiro holds that the answers to the great questions of biology all reside in the material components of life and their arrangement, then he must realize this to be just another philosophical position.

Casey Luskin
August 29, 2011, 11:55 AM

James Shapiro’s Evolution: A View from the 21st Century Offers a Stunning Look at Biological Complexity and Non-Darwinian Evolution

Shapiro is not a promoter of the classical modern neo-Darwinian model of evolution. Rather, he believes that in a sense, biological organisms are programmed to evolve.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5

Trending

  • Examining “Professor Dave’s” Absurd Attack on Casey Luskin
  • How We Moved Beyond Darwin to the Miracle of Man
  • When Does Human Life Begin?
  • Why Are Science Reporters So Credulous?
  • Human Origins — The Scientific Imagination at Play
  • How Much Can Evolution Really Accomplish?

InfoDesk

  • Molecular Machines
  • Fine-Tuning Parameters
  • Theistic Evolution
  • Charles Darwin

Recommended

  • More Cambrian Woes for Evolution
  • What Is ID and How Should We Defend It?
  • New Form of Biological Self-Replication?
  • Caltech Finds Amazing Role for Noncoding DNA
  • Ultra-Conserved Elements: Same Old Results

Archives

  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2022 Discovery Institute