Dr. Marks is obviously right. A sculpture has more information than the raw material from which the image was sculpted.
Whether your dog can philosophize is not a puzzle you need to look to the Oxford English Dictionary to resolve.
Egnor he nails it by noting that Shallit, not uniquely, falls victim to the mereological fallacy.
I think it’s the first time I’ve heard a discussion of the second of law thermodynamics on cable TV.
When a militant atheist rampages, we look in vain for reflections from atheist evolutionists.