Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • Günter BechlyGünter Bechly
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 04.11.21
  • |
  • Search

Tag: John Jay College

Evolution News @DiscoveryCSC
April 11, 2019, 11:40 AM

Polar Bear Seminar: On Retracting — and Not Retracting — Errors 

It was Nathan Lents himself who wrote, “I’ve made mistakes, some I caught, others someone else caught. I always correct it the best I can. That’s what honest people do.”

Brian Miller
April 3, 2019, 4:07 AM

In His Latest Review of Behe’s Darwin Devolves, Nathan Lents Misses the Forest for the Trees

Evolutionists now increasingly believe that major adaptations are driven by neutral mutations.

Jonathan McLatchie
April 2, 2019, 4:07 AM

Does T-urf13 Refute Irreducible Complexity? A Response to Arthur Hunt

Since 2007, Hunt has been claiming to have refuted Michael Behe’s thesis that irreducible complexity cannot arise by mindless evolutionary processes.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
March 9, 2019, 4:00 AM

Hysteria: Scientists Link Darwin Devolves with Measles Upsurge, Catastrophic Climate Change

Duke University professor Alexander Rosenberg has until now held the prize for the most over-the-top demonizing of the mild-mannered biochemist.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
February 27, 2019, 4:22 PM

According to Biologist Nathan Lents, It’s “Racist” to Invite Condemnation of Racism

Not content with ripping Dr. Behe, Professor Lents now seeks to assassinate my character. Try to follow his logic if you can.

Posts navigation

Page1 Page2 Next

Trending

  • The Cambrian Explosion Has Just Gone Nuclear
  • The God Hypothesis Versus Atheist Science Denial
  • The Mystery of Blindsight Helps Us Understand the Mind Better
  • Meyer, Robinson: Yes, Reason and Materialism CAN Be Separated
  • Intelligent Design May Speak to Young People’s Spiritual Interests

Recommended

  • A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His Mind
  • Life’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made Accessible
  • Codes Are Not Products of Physics
  • Ixnay on the Ambriancay Plosionexhay
  • Design Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2021 Discovery Institute