Now and then the query is posed in a polite manner by a thoughtful correspondent.
“None of the common Ice Age mammals and birds responded to any of the climate changes at La Brea in the last 35,000 years.”
If you’re like me, you have wondered why many Darwinists seem consistently unwilling or unable to grasp basic points pertaining to their opponents’ arguments.
Though Judge Jones’s findings were false when he made them in 2005, many have used his ruling as an excuse to perpetuate these false criticisms of ID.
Is this all it takes to get published by Cambridge University Press these days?