Tag: Judge John E. Jones
Coyne: “The Tuxedo Is Fraying”!
It’s not too often you see a denser collation of cliché taunts directed at intelligent design.
Perplexing: Michael Behe’s Critics Falsely Claim He Ignores Exaptation
Writing in the journal Science, reviewers Lents, Swamidass, and Lenski make a very specific, clear, strong, and unambiguous claim.
Unguided Darwinian Mechanism’s “Self-Limiting” Nature Is What Dooms It
Evolution is all, or almost all, evolution by destruction. Michael Behe gives the analogy of a bridge separating you from an invading group of enemies.
Surprise: Lents Clarifies that Book Not Intended as Refutation of Intelligent Design!
I explained that his writing has certainly seemed like a subtweet, at the very least, directed at ID. Others appear to understand it similarly.
Look What They’re Teaching at Brigham Young University
In biology class, associate professor Jamie Jensen seeks to inculcate her students with Epicureanism.