One inconsistency is their unlivable claim that “we have no free will.”
Who — or what — determines what we are? Why does it matter? And how should we act in light of the answers to those questions?
Whether the subject is evolution or climate change, the purpose of accusing someone of “science-denial” is to keep that person in line.
It was, and is, the most controversial Catholic document of the past century, and perhaps of any century.
“Well, we can’t touch the third rail, so the question becomes, How can we safely get past it?”