The dispute started when a review in Science proposed the 2012 article by Näsvall et al. as evidence against Mike Behe’s book Darwin Devolves.
Richard Lenski has spent decades overseeing the most extensive, most acclaimed laboratory evolution experiment conducted to date.
A very common way to try to discredit an argument is to exaggerate it, ignore distinctions an author makes, and/or change carefully qualified claims into bizarre absolutes.
In a few days I will offer a detailed rebuttal. But here is the overwhelmingly important point to notice right up front.
It’s always refreshing to find a journalist who has thought through the scientific issues related to intelligent design for himself.