Skip to content
Evolution News Logo

EVOLUTION NEWS

& SCIENCE TODAY

Menu
  • Science
      • EvolutionEvolution
      • MedicineMedicine
      • Human OriginsHuman Origins
      • Neuroscience and MindNeuroscience & Mind
      • Intelligent DesignIntelligent Design
      • Physics, Earth, and SpacePhysics, Earth & Space
      • Life SciencesLife Sciences
    Close
  • Culture
      • Culture & EthicsCulture & Ethics
      • NewsmediaNews Media
      • EducationEducation
      • Faith & ScienceFaith & Science
      • Free SpeechFree Speech
    • Close
  • Writers
      • casey-luskin-2020-tnCasey Luskin
      • Bioinformation SymposiumDenyse O’Leary
      • beheMichael Behe
      • paul-nelson-headshotPaul Nelson
      • wittJonathan Witt
      • ann-gauger-headshotAnn Gauger
      • douglas-axe-headshotDouglas Axe
      • michael-denton-headshotMichael Denton
      • stephen-meyer-headshotStephen Meyer
      • chaffee-1Sarah Chaffee
      • david-berlinski-headshotDavid Berlinski
      • john-west-headshotJohn West
      • Michael-Egnor-Stony-BrookMichael Egnor
      • smithWesley Smith
      • gsimmons-tnGeoffrey Simmons
      • david-klinghoffer-headshotDavid Klinghoffer
      • wellsJonathan Wells
      • dr_brian_miller_headshot-22Brian Miller
      • michael-flannery-headshotMichael Flannery
      • Günter BechlyGünter Bechly
    • Close
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Spanish Edition
  • 04.12.21
  • |
  • Search

Tag: machines

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
June 1, 2019, 4:00 AM

Robert Marks: Why “Edmond de Belamy” Is Bunk

It has to do with the difference between interpolation and extrapolation.

Faith & Science IconFaith & Science
Walter Myers III
May 8, 2019, 4:22 AM

On Book Tour, Marcos Eberlin Sparks Thought About the ID Movement

During the Q&A, an attendee asked why intelligent design proponents don’t just come out and explicitly say the designer is God.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
April 30, 2019, 5:03 PM

Artificial Intelligence as a “Magic Act”

The error is not completely different from imagining that natural selection really can do what creative intelligence — foresight! — can do.

Granville Sewell
April 29, 2019, 4:04 AM

In Search of Self-Replicating Clocks

That Darwinism seems even superficially plausible depends completely on the ability of living things to reproduce themselves without significant degradation.

David Klinghoffer@d_klinghoffer
April 18, 2019, 1:37 PM

Richards: False Prophecies of a Robotic Future Are Based on a False Darwinian Premise

The rejoinder to this way of thinking, which Jay Richards expresses with wonderful concision, is that humans possess a unique capacity forever setting us apart from machines.

Posts navigation

Prev Page1 Page2 Page3 Page4 Page5 … Page7 Next

Trending

  • The Cambrian Explosion Has Just Gone Nuclear
  • The Mystery of Blindsight Helps Us Understand the Mind Better
  • Meyer, Robinson: Yes, Reason and Materialism CAN Be Separated
  • New Article Purports to Help Explain the Origin of the Genetic Code
  • Intelligent Design May Speak to Young People’s Spiritual Interests

Recommended

  • A Physician Describes How Behe Changed His Mind
  • Life’s Origin — A “Mystery” Made Accessible
  • Codes Are Not Products of Physics
  • Ixnay on the Ambriancay Plosionexhay
  • Design Triangulation: My Thanksgiving Gift to All
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • About
  • Privacy
  • Search
© 2021 Discovery Institute