It’s good to be able to report progress.
The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action.
In all of his “poor” design arguments, Lents inadvertently embraces the design inference.
True, things go wrong with our bodies, with results that range from the tragic to the merely expensive or inconvenient.
In his new book, Lents has taken intelligent design theory to task. He is right to do so. How?