Nothing could be timelier than a conversation between Jay Richards and Michael Medved about when it’s permissible to doubt a scientific “consensus.”
People who care about defending freedom of expression are grateful for just about any attention the issue receives from the media.
As presented by prestige media outlets, the evolution debate never really advances beyond 1925, the year of the Scopes trial.
Weikart, a meticulous scholar, traces the connection in his book From Darwin to Hitler, demonstrating that Darwin’s theory is tainted at its origins.
What do we miss, as members of the public, by focusing on daily headlines rather than pulling back for the big picture sometimes?