You may have noticed a strange loop which arises spontaneously in many sectors of the intelligent design debate.
Darwinists easily obtain a global microphone to rant against intelligent design, while ID advocates silently gain adherents. Is it a sign of desperation?
When Michael Behe’s slide show flashed to a close up of the gears, a murmur of astonishment rolled through the audience.
I bring this up because some have claimed that I advocate a sole genetic progenitorship model for the first couple.
In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence.