Scientists who label intelligent design as a “God of the gaps” argument are not unlike the incensed man in the art gallery.
The Twitter feud has gone viral, with many praising Steak-umm’s sizzling retorts.
Students are adept at spotting the incongruities, double standards, and tendentious arguments that often accompany methodological naturalism.
“Methodological naturalism is a very depressing thing to be told is the truth,” says an 18-year-old correspondent. “Your work may have saved my life.”
Does philosopher of biology Paul Nelson reject “mainstream science”? Of course he does not.