In Darwinist argumentation, Phillip Johnson found a panoply of euphemism and wishful thinking masquerading as evidence.
A muddle emerges from textbooks’ unprincipled use of theology.
We know that Darwinian evolution has a long and sordid history of entanglement with issues of race, racism, and eugenics.
Ironically, our students may have more intellectual freedom in China to pursue the truth than they would have in many universities in the United States.
The rule, as he explains, is arbitrary. True, the designing agent inferred by ID theory is not directly observable, but neither are the elementary particles.