In my previous replies to Marshall’s review in Science of Darwin’s Doubt, I’ve responded to his critiques of the main argument of the book.
According to Charles Marshall, I argue “that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer’s intervention.”
To rebut the central argument of Darwin’s Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence.
Leading paleontologists and evolutionary biologists (such as Dr. Marshall) are nowhere close to solving the Cambrian enigma.
Jonathan Merritt conducts an excellent interview with Dr. Stephen Meyer for Religion News Service.