Tag: Meyer’s Responses
More on Small Shelly Fossils and the Length of the Cambrian Explosion: A Concluding Response to Charles Marshall
In my previous replies to Marshall’s review in Science of Darwin’s Doubt, I’ve responded to his critiques of the main argument of the book.
Does Darwin’s Doubt Commit the God-of-the-Gaps Fallacy?
According to Charles Marshall, I argue “that paleontologists are unable to explain the Cambrian explosion, thus opening the door to the possibility of a designer’s intervention.”
To Build New Animals, No New Genetic Information Needed? More in Reply in Charles Marshall
To rebut the central argument of Darwin’s Doubt, Marshall must deny (or push from view) what we know about what new forms of animal life require as a condition of their existence.
When Theory Trumps Observation: Responding to Charles Marshall’s Review of Darwin’s Doubt
Leading paleontologists and evolutionary biologists (such as Dr. Marshall) are nowhere close to solving the Cambrian enigma.
RNS Interview: Meyer’s “Intelligent Defense of Intelligent Design”
Jonathan Merritt conducts an excellent interview with Dr. Stephen Meyer for Religion News Service.