Tag: Michael Behe
The Nobel Prize and Intelligent Evolution
The contrast between the evolutionary sterility of Lenski’s unintelligent Darwinian evolution and the evolutionary potency of Arnold, Smith, and Winter’s intelligent evolution is striking.
Behe’s Irreducible Complexity Validated by Chemistry Nobel
Darwinist Jerry Coyne misunderstands design science. Intelligent design is two scientific inferences.
How the 2018 Nobel Laureates in Chemistry Harnessed Intelligent Design
There is one point of confusion in descriptions of this year’s prize winners. It’s the talk of “directed evolution.”
Origin of Long-Distance Running — More Evolution by Breaking Things
A central problem for theories of unguided evolution has always been the challenge of building complex biological novelties.
Smithsonian Misrepresents Evolution to AP Biology Students
Basically, it’s a how-to guide for sugarcoating evolutionary dogma in the science classroom.