Tag: Michael Egnor
Behe’s Irreducible Complexity Validated by Chemistry Nobel
Darwinist Jerry Coyne misunderstands design science. Intelligent design is two scientific inferences.
Egnor Versus Shallit: Can Brains Learn?
Egnor he nails it by noting that Shallit, not uniquely, falls victim to the mereological fallacy.
Michael Egnor on Animal Generosity
The failure to understand the gulf that separates humans from animals, and humans from machines, is a source of confusion to rival almost any other.
Nathan Lents Is Back; Still Wrong About Sinuses
The interaction with Lents is of interest because it provides an opportunity to look again, in some detail, at a fascinating illustration of design in action.
Egnor: Democracy, Tyranny, and Technology
“It is the obscurity of AI that most impairs liberty. We do not know what is being done to us or even what is being done by us.”