Most Darwinists are far savvier in how they seek to persuade the public.
Scientists aren’t like “everyone else”: because of the prestige they enjoy, the impact of their being “uncritical of things that [they] want to believe” is tremendous. It can be quite corrosive, quite malign.
Oddities of neuroscience that indicate that there is more going on in the brain than mere chemistry.
Anyone who’d spoken up, says Professor Egnor, would likely have lost his career. He points to a striking parallel.
When someone tells you to believe something simply because it’s “the scientific consensus,” reserve judgment. Consensus, says Egnor, is “a political concept, not a scientific one.”