Shermer tries to rewrite history by insisting that science is built on atheistic assumptions.
My last hospice patient, Bob, told me that after some months of just wanting to be dead, that he had “come out of the fog.”
It’s not, how shall I say this, an audience guaranteed to be sympathetic to a critique of Darwinism and its social impact, even one as thoroughly researched and accurately told as this.
Recently, atheist Michael Shermer debated Catholic philosopher Edward Feser. The subject was Feser’s new book on five arguments for the existence of God.
A biologist at Case Western Reserve demonstrates why peer-review really is the gold standard of scholarly credibility.