It’s not, how shall I say this, an audience guaranteed to be sympathetic to a critique of Darwinism and its social impact, even one as thoroughly researched and accurately told as this.
Recently, atheist Michael Shermer debated Catholic philosopher Edward Feser. The subject was Feser’s new book on five arguments for the existence of God.
A biologist at Case Western Reserve demonstrates why peer-review really is the gold standard of scholarly credibility.
Yet, having conceded, Shermer goes on to move the goalpost.
If you follow science news, that could be the headline on a story from the research world at least once a month.