Considering Hamlet, the Aristotelian can appreciate both the physiology and the drama to which the mechanist is blind.
He doesn’t mean there won’t be humans in the Oval Office in the future, but that the power behind the power will be AI. Is it true?
As Denyse O’Leary asks, “Why is it comparatively easy to develop a program to play chess, as opposed to teaching a robot to walk freely?”
A peculiar habit of disassociation is widespread among many who study the brain.
Egnor he nails it by noting that Shallit, not uniquely, falls victim to the mereological fallacy.